Highlights
1. The province of Sultan Kudarat heavily relies on natural water sources such as rivers and seas for food, water, agriculture, irrigation, and household activities.
2. There is no current research on and assessment of the potential risks and condition of these water sources in the province.
3. The province needs to revise regulations and create relevant policies based on the results of the research regarding water conservation and environmental protection.
Figures 4 and 5 show the current conditions of the Allah and Kapingkong Rivers.
Figure 4. Current condition of the Allah River
Figure 5. Current condition of the Kapingkong River
Results
1. Instrumental Analysis
Instrumental analyses performed to qualitatively determine the levels of toxic heavy metals cadmium and lead (ppm), pH, and turbidity of the samples obtained. Table 2 shows the turbidity and pH of the different water bodies while table 3 shows the levels of cadmium and lead in ppm.
Table 2. pH and Turbidity of the water bodies
Table 2 shows the turbidity and pH of the two rivers and two seas concerned in this research. The acceptable pH standard ranges for rivers and seas, which tells the acidity of the water bodies, are 6.5-8.5 and 7.5-8.5 respectively [7]. It shows that the two rivers went below the safety limit while the two seawater were on the lower boundary safe limit. An acidic river is very dangerous especially to plants and animals that cannot withstand and adapt to an acidic environment. Morover, an acidic water can leach out other metals, which can cause other detrimental effects.
Turbidity is the measure of the clearness of a liquid and is usually associated to the total suspended solids. A high turbidity means that there are a lot of suspended solids associated in the liquid that can hinder the light from passing through. This can be harmful to life forms beneath the water bodies. Results show that the two rivers are extremely turbid while the two seawater aremoderately clear [8].
Table 3. Levels of cadmium and lead in the water bodies
Results show that the two heavy metals are present in all four water bodies in varying concentrations. All fresh water and one seawater went above the allowed safety limit of 0.005 ppm and projected blood safety level of 10 ug/dL for lead. On the other hand, all fresh water samples and one seawater exceeded the allowed safety limit of 0.005 ppm for cadmium but had an acceptable projected blood level.
2. Survey and Interview
This section presents the results obtained from the surveys and interviews of the residents living around the water bodies and of the government officials of the municipalities, and barangays that cover the areas of the water bodies concerned. Both quantitative and qualitative assessments were used to evaluate the current and past conditions of the water bodies in almost 40 years and rated from 1 to 10, where 10 is the highest and 6 as acceptable with a well-constructed rubric shown in figure 6. Figure 7 shows the average number of documented flora and fauna thriving in the rivers (there were no available data for the seas due to the more complex ecosystem).
Figure 6. Average conditions of the rivers and seas over the years
Figure 6 shows that the two rivers are in severe condition averaging around 3 out of 10 when rated by the residents and government officials on its usability, current condition, appearance, usefulness, and health impacts. On the other hand, the seawaters were rated relatively high and passed the mentioned criteria. It can also be seen that there is a dramatic decrease on the ratings from 2005 to 2010 particularly on the rivers. This was the period when the municipalities of Esperanza, Isulan, and Tacurong entered fast industrialization and modernisation where agricultural and natural lands were converted to plantations, hospitals, huge buildings, markets, retail mass, etc.
Figure 7. Number of Flora and Fauna Species Thriving on the two Rivers over the years
According to figure 7, there is continuous decrease on the documented number of flora and fauna species thriving in the two rivers over the years. This can be attributed to the natural disturbances such as erosion and flood and to the quality of the water in general. An acidic pH is harmful to most plants and animals as well as a very turbid water which blocks oxygen and sunlight from passing through. Furthermore, heavy metals can contribute to extinction of species as heavy metals are toxic to most living organisms. This contributes to lowering of the pH level and degrading quality of water in general.
3. Government Performance Analysis
Government Administration: In the Philippines, the province of Sultan Kudarat has one of the highest poverty incidence rates with 48% of its families living below $2,000 annually [9]. Moreover, the province ranks 68 out of 79 provinces on the good governance index, which measures the performance of the government in terms of economic governance, political governance, and administrative governance [10]. Sultan Kudarat also ranks 62/79 on the ranking for access to clean water category [11].
Law and Garbage Collection: Currently, there are several presidential decrees and laws that mandate the protection and preservation of natural sources such as rivers, and seas. However, there has been few to none cases where a person or a company had been fined or subjected to trial due to contaminating the aforementioned water bodies where around 50 tons of garbage are disposed by the province in the natural water sources every day. In fact, 88.46% of the total garbage of the province remains to be uncollected [12]. Due to this, these garbages are usually burned, buried or thrown in the water bodies by residents as means of disposal.
Health: The number of cases of diarrheas, fever, intestinal parasites, nausea, weakening, and anemia in the communities near the bodies of water is higher compared to those who are not. These illnesses can be related to the quality of water bodies, which are highly utilised by the people in their daily activities and due to long term exposure. On the other hand, according to the 2013 report of the Department of Health, the percentage of households with access to safe water is below the national standards as well as the percentage of households with sanitary toilet facilities.